With the confirmation that Welles was the author of Bogdanovich's refutation of "Raising Kane",
it might be worthwhile to revist the Authorship Question.
Summary of the Two Arguments:
- - - - - - - - - - -
1) The Wellesians:
- Houseman had a vendetta against Welles
and leaked the story to Kael.
- Kael never even contacted Welles
to get his side of the story.
- Houseman was keeping Mank off the sauce in Victorville
and was only aware of Mank's script.
He never saw Welles's revisions.
- Welles's secretary confirmed his contributions
- Welles was a gifted writer
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2) Houseman/Kael etc.
- Welles had a history of claiming or implying authorship credit
that he was not entitled to,
as during interviews on "War of the Worlds"
- Welles may have intended to cut Mank out of authorship credit completely,
until learning that the new Guild contract would prevent him from doing so.
- Houseman was very aware of who contributed what
because he saw the finished film and it aligned roughly
with what Mank had written.
- No one denies that as Director etc.
Welles made significant changes to the script.
The question is whether he deserved co-writer credit.
- Welles had to claim authorship credit in order to maintain
the wunderkind mantle of a 'One Man Band'
- Although he never definitively went on the record,
Mank was clearly upset at Welles grabbing the glory.
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
I don't think this Board has had a debate on the Authorship Question.
Did Welles deserve the Oscar that, Lear-like his daughter tried to sell?

