Hitchcock forgotten - for Store Hadji

Including those who have made films ABOUT Welles

Postby Peter Tonguette » Thu Aug 29, 2002 7:26 pm

Welles Fan: I agree about "Strangers on a Train." Great picture.

"Family Plot" is a really fascinating film to me, I must say. On a surface level, it's a wonderfully light mystery comedy: a vein Hitchcock hadn't really worked in since perhaps "The Trouble With Harry" (although "North by Northwest" also qualifies in some ways.) But on a deeper level, I think the film really was something of a self-reflective "goodbye." Yes, Hitchcock planned other projects after "FP," but there's this overwhelming sense in the movie of a great artist bidding farewell to his audience. The final wink to the camera really says it all.

It's a flawed work, but -- for Hitchcock fans -- impossible to ignore.

Peter
Peter Tonguette
Member
 
Posts: 72
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2002 7:12 pm

Postby Store Hadji » Thu Aug 29, 2002 8:43 pm

Welles' quotes panning Hitchcock, and several other directors, can be found in the book ORSON WELLES INTERVIEWS, which includes old newspaper and magazine interviews, and freshly translated stuff from Cahiers. Worth a read, especially since Welles' disparaging comments were all excised from This Is Orson Welles.

My other favourite directors are Terry Gilliam, Kubrick, and Erich von Stroheim.
Sto Pro Veritate
User avatar
Store Hadji
Wellesnet Advanced
 
Posts: 947
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2002 11:10 pm

Postby jaime marzol » Thu Aug 29, 2002 10:25 pm

welles dished huston in SARRIS' INTERVIEWS WITH FILM DIRECTORS. said kubrik was better director than huston, and the killing a better picture than the asphalt jungle. even if it is true, a friend just doesn't say those things.

like huston told flynn before they got in a fist fight. flynn badmouthed a woman they both knew, huston said, "that's a lie, and if it's not, you are a son of a bitch for saying it."

has any one read that when FAT CITY premiered bogdanovich and another young whipper snapper movie guy were in the audience laughing at it?
User avatar
jaime marzol
Wellesnet Legend
 
Posts: 1101
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2001 3:24 am

Postby Store Hadji » Thu Aug 29, 2002 10:29 pm

How about the dubbing of The Spanish Earth, when Welles told Hemingway to cut some narration, Ernest called Welles an effeminate theatrical, Welles starting poncing, saying "Oh, Mr. Hemingway, you're SO BIG and SO STRONG," and they wound up throwing chairs at each other.

THAT'S what friends are for.
Sto Pro Veritate
User avatar
Store Hadji
Wellesnet Advanced
 
Posts: 947
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2002 11:10 pm

Postby jaime marzol » Thu Aug 29, 2002 11:59 pm

...........

the quote i read about that here was hillarious, it's worthy of a tshirt. the tshirt would look like this

ERNEST HEMINGWAY
TO
ORSON WELLES
"what do you affeminate boys of the
ny theater know about real war?"
User avatar
jaime marzol
Wellesnet Legend
 
Posts: 1101
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2001 3:24 am

Postby jaime marzol » Fri Aug 30, 2002 12:02 am

...........

hemingway is like hotspur of the north in CHIMES. he needs a passel of horns blowing he every boast.
User avatar
jaime marzol
Wellesnet Legend
 
Posts: 1101
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2001 3:24 am

Postby Jeff Wilson » Fri Aug 30, 2002 12:24 am

In most Hitchcock films women start off pristine and polished but end up being undone by their own hand. Welles shared this theme to some extent with Hitchcock; Kane and The Lady from Shanghai are good examples.


I don't agree about that in this instance; Elsa is clearly evil all along in SHANGHAI, as she is simply stringing O'Hara along to make him her patsy, as are the others, for different reasons. The women in KANE aren't really pillars of strength either; Emily is a rich girl who turns into a shrew and is disposed of via auto wreck; Susan is just a puppet from the start, until she finally discovers her backbone and leaves Kane, even though it ruins her as well. So in the end, she actually gains some stature.
User avatar
Jeff Wilson
Site Admin
 
Posts: 900
Joined: Wed May 30, 2001 7:21 pm
Location: Detroit

Postby LA » Fri Aug 30, 2002 11:22 am

Peter T. said: "On a surface level, it's a wonderfully light mystery comedy: a vein Hitchcock hadn't really worked in since perhaps "The Trouble With Harry" (although "North by Northwest" also qualifies in some ways.) But on a deeper level, I think the film really was something of a self-reflective "goodbye.""

That's an interesting idea, I must take another look at Family Plot soon. Loved The Trouble With Harry too, great light black comedy, perfectly judged acting IMO, and beautiful location photography. Pity Hitch didn't make more films like that, apparently it flopped at the box-office. Oh well.
User avatar
LA
Member
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Thu May 31, 2001 2:34 pm

Postby dm olson » Mon Sep 09, 2002 3:42 am

When Hitchcock mastered his 'psychosis' films, which predate Psycho by nearly six years, he really had hit his peak. Shadow of a Doubt, Strangers on a Train, Vertigo and Rear Window, they really showed someone who knew how to peel a grape. 'The Birds' and even 'North by Northwest' seemed to me a playful move back to entertainment, tho NbNw is among my favourites. Heck, no one ever talks about his early 40s thriller-boilers like Saboteur and Foreign Correspondent, two flicks that leave me with a great appreciation for his keen eye for pure fun.
John Ford may be not as famous today, but his story-telling style in The Searchers and Grapes of Wrath punches-out most modern-day 'auteurs' easily. He was more a simple, straight film-roller, but when he breaks free from his Hemingway-esque manner, delving into the head of John Wayne when we near the climax in Searchers -- how a tired, fired up hunt for revenge turns into quickly into salvation job of the noblest order, he demonstrated the touch of a poet.
dm olson
New Member
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2002 2:29 pm

Postby mteal » Thu Sep 19, 2002 11:58 am

Speaking of The Birds, at the Universal theme park in Florida, I've heard that they show a bird-attack scene from that film in 3D. Does this mean that the entire film was shot that way? I can't imagine why they've never released it if it was. One of my favorite Hitchcock films is the the 3D version of DIAL M FOR MURDER, a film that, when you see it on TV or in a normal 2D format, isn't nearly as much fun. A 3D version of The Birds would be incredible.
User avatar
mteal
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1178
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2001 11:31 pm

Postby Harvey Chartrand » Thu Sep 19, 2002 12:14 pm

Hitchcock rules!
As for John Ford, his future's all used up.
Harvey Chartrand
Wellesnet Advanced
 
Posts: 527
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Previous

Return to Other Directors

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron