who will be the next orson welles

Including those who have made films ABOUT Welles

Postby jaime marzol » Sat Apr 27, 2002 4:14 am

undoubtedly, the tarentino penis is prominently warbling in the mouth of the world. i am not in that group. i thought Pulp Fiction was just ok. a bit long actually. did not like Reservoir Dogs at all. thought Jackie Brown sucked. but that's ok, we are not supposed to like the same stuff. i think the best thing tarentino has done was the screenplay for TRUE ROMANCE. other than that i could go a lifetime and never see anything he's done so far.
User avatar
jaime marzol
Wellesnet Legend
 
Posts: 1101
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2001 3:24 am

Postby Jaime N. Christley » Sat Apr 27, 2002 4:48 am

undoubtedly, the tarentino penis is prominently warbling in the mouth of the world.


You sure have a way with words.

It's not like that, though - in some of the film groups I interact with, Tarantino is long out of fashion.
Jaime N. Christley
Wellesnet Veteran
 
Posts: 188
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2002 12:56 am

Postby jaime marzol » Sat Apr 27, 2002 12:40 pm

LET ME RECAST MY STATEMENT:

"undoubtedly, for a few years after PULP FICTION, the tarentino penis was prominently warbling in the mouth of the world."

so, he's yesterday's dish already? did not know he was so out of fashion. so who's is prominently warbling in the mouth of the world today?

last i heard (and i avoid such news like the pleague) the director of MOULING ROUGE (and i avoid such films like the pleague) was receiving lots of oral sex.

what about that guy who did EL MARIACHI, he was hot for a while. but DUSK TILL DAWN i thought SUCKED. was very dissapointing. only thing i liked about it is that blues tune by TITO AND TARANTULA, great tune.
User avatar
jaime marzol
Wellesnet Legend
 
Posts: 1101
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2001 3:24 am

Postby jaime marzol » Sat Apr 27, 2002 1:08 pm

............

i was going to say the guys who did BLAIR WITCH were THE guys today, but they are over now too aren't they? it's hard to keep up with who 'the latest guy' is. they come and go like pop stars. only the very talented remain. branagh is still around, and untarnished. in actying tim robbins i respected for a long time because he was in good film after good film, never letting his pants down in the back. but that ended.
User avatar
jaime marzol
Wellesnet Legend
 
Posts: 1101
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2001 3:24 am

Postby jaime marzol » Sat Apr 27, 2002 3:38 pm

jaime c wrote:
You sure have a way with words.

after i wrote:
undoubtedly, the tarentino penis is prominently warbling in the mouth of the world.

i answer:
metaphorically connection oral sex with the world at the feet of a certain individual is close enough to the mark, and was entertaining enough to think about that i bothered to come on line and post it. had it popped into my brain in a more clinical form it would not have driven me to come here and share with you lucky folks. but if i get to throw in penis, or blowjob, while not straying from the topic at hand? well, that's different.

certainly both penis, and blowjobs, metaphorically, have been giant motivators of characters in fiction, and non-fiction, and are prominent spicers, narratives, and motivatiors in a grerat many of the ouvres discussed here on this board.

the penis, and oral sex, metaphorically speaking, have been directly responsible for spurring into action some of our time's greatest triumphs, and defeats, greatest leaders and tragedies, greatest conductors, actors, and pop stars of our time.

then once the penis was associated with the oval office, it was legitamized. you can now say 'penis' at cocktail parties, and i bet even on the Ophra show, without being hissed by the feminist rightwing in the audience.

but it's possible i've reached my quota for the month on typing "blowjob."

can we imaging a shakespeare play with no 'penis' motivations? maybe only king lear which was that topsy-turvy story, and deals with greed, betrayal, senility.

tell it like it is, i say.
User avatar
jaime marzol
Wellesnet Legend
 
Posts: 1101
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2001 3:24 am

Postby Rick Schmidlin » Sat Apr 27, 2002 7:56 pm

Do you really have to resort to that kind of language to make your point. By doing so you take a great discredit for the good comments you make.
Rick Schmidlin
User avatar
Rick Schmidlin
Member
 
Posts: 69
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2001 1:23 am

Postby Jeff Wilson » Sat Apr 27, 2002 10:05 pm

I agree with Rick here. I'm not sure what a discourse on penises and oral sex achieves in the general progress of this thread, other than to indicate it's run its useful course...
User avatar
Jeff Wilson
Site Admin
 
Posts: 900
Joined: Wed May 30, 2001 7:21 pm
Location: Detroit

Postby aggie » Sun Apr 28, 2002 6:37 am

King Lear? hardly:

Fool:
The cod-piece that will house
Before the head has any,
The head and he shall louse;
So beggars marry many.
(King Lear III iii 27-30)

Fool:
Cry to it, nuncle, as the cockney did to the eels when she put 'em i' the paste alive; she knapped 'em o' the coxcombs with a stick, and cried, "Down, wantons, down!" 'Twas her brother that, in pure kindness to his horse, buttered his hay.
(King Lear II iv 123-128)

Lear:
Thou shalt not die: die for adultery! No:
The wren goes to 't, and the small gilded fly
Does lecher in my sight.
Let copulation thrive; for Gloucester's bastard son
Was kinder to his father than my daughters
Got 'tween the lawful sheets.
To 't luxury, pell-mell! for I lack soldiers.
(King Lear IV vi 114-120)

etc etc
aggie
Member
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2001 5:47 am

Postby jaime marzol » Sun Apr 28, 2002 12:07 pm

i stand corrected, the 'male member' looms prominently in shakespeare's lear, but i was refering to motivations, not to the mere mention of the little fellow.

i was having a bit of fun. did not mean to offend any one and will refrain from metaphoring. the name tarentino just seemed to call for such words, and 'sh*t-head', and '*sshole' too, i don't know why.
User avatar
jaime marzol
Wellesnet Legend
 
Posts: 1101
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2001 3:24 am

Postby jaime marzol » Sun Apr 28, 2002 1:58 pm

..............

i seem to get my hand slapped a lot around here.
User avatar
jaime marzol
Wellesnet Legend
 
Posts: 1101
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2001 3:24 am

Postby jaime marzol » Sun Apr 28, 2002 3:04 pm

............

maybe, sometimes i have a slappable hand.
User avatar
jaime marzol
Wellesnet Legend
 
Posts: 1101
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2001 3:24 am

Postby PT Caffey » Mon May 06, 2002 6:00 am

Before I'll annoint Tarantino "the next Orson," I shall first have to see what he does with radio.
PT Caffey
Member
 
Posts: 35
Joined: Mon May 06, 2002 5:45 am

Postby Obssessed_with_Orson » Mon May 06, 2002 1:57 pm

i'll agree to that one, brother!

i don't really think any can beat what he did on the radio.

bye now!
Obssessed_with_Orson
Wellesnet Veteran
 
Posts: 279
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2002 3:04 pm
Location: Bakersfield, CA

Postby mteal » Mon May 06, 2002 2:47 pm

I doubt that Tarentino - or anyone else for that matter - will ever get the chance to do what Welles did on radio, since radio doesn't really exist as a dramatic medium anymore. Instead, they would have to do it on television. Haven't seen much from Tarentino yet in that regard, but David Lynch has done some outstanding work on the small screen, including the only TV show I've been hooked on in the past 20 years: Twin Peaks (The show fell apart somewhat after the resolution of the Laura Palmer mystery, but up until that point it was some of the best television I'd ever seen). Lynch also did a fine docu TV series called American Chronicles, and his recent masterwork, Mulholland Drive, even started out as a TV pilot. Lynch, IMO, is much closer to assuming Welles' mantle then Tarentino is.
User avatar
mteal
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1170
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2001 11:31 pm

Previous

Return to Other Directors

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest