Mr. Arkadin - Comparing the 3 Versions

Discuss Welles's other European films.

Postby Fredric » Fri Mar 15, 2002 3:18 pm

I'll try to use this thread to compare the three movie versions of Mr. Arkadin, and I'll try to avoid repeating things that are already in the Rosenbaum Article. Who knows when I'll really have time to go through all three films, but I'll try to list things as I think of them. Here are a few things off the top of my head:

1. The Corinth Arkadin is closer in form to the Public Domain version. This may seem shocking, but it's not as bad as it sounds once we realize what is different between these two versions. I'll leave Confidential Report out for the moment:

a. Take the public domain version and flesh it out a bit. One of the reasons the PD version is so choppy is that the "editors" of it seemd to have taken the Corinth version and cut out all suggestions of flashbacks. Both the Corinth and PD versions begin the same way, with the text, the plane flying, and the cast pics. The only difference here is that Akim's clip comes first in the Corinth Version and second-to-last in the PD version, since it goes by order of appearance. I wonder why the PD "choppers" took the time to swap the clips, since it seems they didn't take the time to do much else by way of continuity.

b. The final part of the opening credit sequence in both films involve footage of Van Stratten approaching the building Zouk is in. When the credits finish in the PD version, it cuts abruptly to the Bracco on the dock sequence. The Corinth Version continues the Zouk introduction sequence with Van Stratten entering the attic apartment and finding a near comotose Zouk staring off into space.

c. Such is the case with the PD version all throughout. Generally, the Corinth version periodically fades back to the attic scene where Van Stratten and Zouk banter. This ties the narrative together. PD cuts even the fades, so the edits between sequences are mega-abrupt. This is also the reason I believe the PD cutters used the already-edited Corinth version as a template, whereas the Confidential Report version was edited from raw footage.

2. The oddest thing about the Corinth version, and the reason why I understand how people like Jaime M. prefer the Confidential Report version is the option, by Welles presumably, to overdub narration over actual dialogue. Confidential Report uses the dialogue track, while the other two versions use the overdubbed narration. For the PD version this is horrid, since the editing is butchered anyway. When I realized that the Corinth Version did the same thing, at first I was confused, but then I realized:

a. When placed in the context of the flashback style, with periodic returns to Van Stratten and Zouk, the narration doesn't seem out of place at all. It actually pulls the whole piece tighter. We are continually reminded that this story is being told to Zouk, where in the PD version, it seems like sloppy editing and story construction.

b. Likewise, in the CR version, since there's less narration, and we only begin and end the entire flashback with the attic scene, we forget that the story is being told to Zouk.

Okay, I haven't even gotten started, and I've written a bunch. I'll have to watch the openings of each movie again to continue. I hope people are interested in this. Let me know.
Fredric
User avatar
Fredric
Wellesnet Veteran
 
Posts: 138
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2001 10:26 am

Postby nathan_h » Sat Mar 16, 2002 1:24 pm

I want to underline your statement that while the Corinth version has some similarities to the PD version, one needs to throw all kinds of caveats around that statement:

The pacing of the Corinth version, and nuances in terms of intercutting between pieces of scenes, etc., in the Corinth version is, in my opinion, more sophisticated than the Confidential Report version.

The voiceover reminds (gulp) of Citizen Kane, a bit, in that it bridges from scenes of the telling, in the present, back to the events (which is something you mention) and works well in that context.
User avatar
nathan_h
Member
 
Posts: 31
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2002 4:17 pm

Postby dmolson » Sun Mar 17, 2002 4:59 am

Great info! Not being that familiar with Arkadin since I've only seen it once long ago, but I thought the Public Domain version and one of the others (Corinth?) are virtually the same running time, give or take a few minutes... perhaps I'm wrong. But are there a number of different takes/scenes between the two? I believe there has been a good thread here on this topic before, but I really appreciate your efforts here.
User avatar
dmolson
Wellesnet Veteran
 
Posts: 122
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2001 12:11 pm
Location: Canada

Postby mteal » Mon Mar 18, 2002 9:25 am

Frederic,
Yes, I think the Public Domain version is definitely a butchering of the "Corinth" version. In addition to crudely rearranging all the scenes in chronological order and elimanating all the narration/framing scenes between Van Stratton and Zouk, they also eliminated the scene where Arkadin's financier rival, Sir Joseph, denounces Arkadin as "an unscrupulous barbarian".

It's unfortunate that the public domain version of Arkadin is the one that the market is flooded with. I wonder if the Corinth version is under some kind of copyright. I bought my copy years ago for $4 out of a cheapie bin so it may not be. Of course, who would WANT to copyright the PD mess.

Another way of thinking about the different versions of Arkadin might be:

1. The Corinth Version - Welles' American cut
2. Confidential Report - Welles' British cut
3. Public Domain version - Producer Luis Dolivet's cut
4. Spanish version - Welles' (?) Spanish cut.
User avatar
mteal
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1170
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2001 11:31 pm

Postby sergio » Mon Mar 18, 2002 9:58 am

Fredric,

Thanks for giving this excellent account of some of the differences between the PD and Corinth versions of Arkadin - more please!!!

Sergio
sergio
Member
 
Posts: 42
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2002 7:57 am

Postby Fredric » Mon Mar 18, 2002 10:28 am

I'm now thinking that a good DVD release would be a 2-disc set: one disc being the Corinth and the second disc being Confidential Report. More to come...
Fredric
User avatar
Fredric
Wellesnet Veteran
 
Posts: 138
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2001 10:26 am

Postby Obssessed_with_Orson » Mon Mar 18, 2002 2:42 pm

Wonderful info, fredric. But i'm gonna stick to the only languaged version of the movie i can. English.

But then, if i watched the non-english versions, i wouldn't understand what they're saying, but i would know what was going on.

bye now!
Obssessed_with_Orson
Wellesnet Veteran
 
Posts: 279
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2002 3:04 pm
Location: Bakersfield, CA

Postby jaime marzol » Mon Mar 18, 2002 3:19 pm

great info fredric. inspires me watch them again, all 3 arkadins.

fredric wrote:
"I understand how people like Jaime M. prefer the Confidential Report version."

no, no, the world prefers CR, i love all 3 versions.

and i like your creative naming of the techs who worked on it. the PD Choppers, is perfect.

mteal's naming of the cuts works well. has any one seen the spanish version, and is it different from the other 3?
User avatar
jaime marzol
Wellesnet Legend
 
Posts: 1101
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2001 3:24 am


Return to Mr. Arkadin, The Trial, The Immortal Story, F For Fake

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron