Blunted,
I wouldn't want to suggest that one shouldn't interpret any film in any way one wants. And though, I've seen The Pledge a few times, I'm sure I could be missing something. That said, I really don't see any way that Nicholson could be the killer. What's the basis for Mrs. Blunted and Steve's belief that Nicholson is the killer.
I wonder if there is some nuance or ambiguity that I am missing. If Nicholson were the killer, wouldn't that negate the whole film? Isn't the point of the film that Nicholson "pledge" to find this killer grows into an obsession which ultimately destroys him? Is there some alternate reading of the film that I am just missing? And what is the point of the revelation of the minister dead in the car at the end if he (the minister) is not the killer?
I'm interested to hear your thought (or Mrs. Blunted's) because, as I said, I really admire that film. Ambiguities aside, how did you enjoy it?

