by dmolson » Wed Nov 27, 2002 5:00 am
For the very first time I saw Hitchcock's To Catch a Thief, his homage to the south of France. The images and colours, as revealed on the new Paramount DVD, really sparkled for much of the show, with Hitch limiting his 'blue screen' work to a minimum (in this case, probably 20-30%)... Not the most engaging Hitchcock film, but thanks to its leads and the spectacular scenery, worth sitting through.
I was disappointed a bit about the extras, tho. As with most Hitchcock dvd releases, daughter is featured prominently, fine, sometimes she adds some insight and has given some old home movies that are interesting. Now she's dragging her daughter into it, and what she has to add is really zip, considering she's about two when he made the film. They've got a Hitchcock academian, also one crew member (Herb Coleman?) and the continuity lady Sylvette, who brings some continental intrigue to the show. One featurette is about the writing and cast, but skims over things that generally are easy to deduce. They mention that one of the primary senior French members, the owner of the restaurant, proved incapable of phonetically getting his lines just right, and was totally dubbed in english. Did Hitch not think about casting someone better -- why not Charles Boyer, Maurice Chevalier...? They didn't bother to track down Brigitte Auber, who played Danielle... Couldn't she have added something of interest? They always go back to daughter and daughter with some cliched comment... And why is Roman Polanski given a credit, as though he's interviewed, but nowhere to be seen? (I didn't watch the Edith Head featurette, so apologies if that's where he's relegated)
I also bought the 'High Noon', which has similar featurettes that suffer from some of the similar problems. The Leonard Maltin one is good, includes old interviews with the cast when possible, but two featurettes are just 'Sons and daughters of...' giving virtually no real interesting info. Maybe I'm too cynical, but these projects that are under the direction of the star's relatives really are the blandest I can imagine, the total antithesis of a Robin Leach profile. Really disappointing, but even those dregs can't drain out the appreciation of the original classics....