by Glenn Anders » Tue Jan 13, 2009 6:09 am
Gentlemen: With apologies to keats, there is a fourth Wellsian theme, which encompasses the other three: The dramatic realization of loss due to experience, time or old age, seen as a profoundly motivating human factor. We can find this theme in CITIZEN KANE, THE MAGNIFICENT AMBERSONS, THE STRANGER, THE LADY FROM SHANGHAI, MACBETH, OTHELLO, MR. ARKADIN, TOUCH OF EVIL, THE TRIAL, FALSTAFF, THE IMMORTAL STORY, and F FOR FAKE. I think the latter remarks about Robert Arden or Patricia Medina fit very much into these Wellsian themes brought up:
It was not Robert Arden's fault that MR. ARKADIN's marvelous edit, which I saw in 1955, was botched so that the picture was not released in America for seven years, or that by 1962, there were half a dozen fugitive versions, all of them inferior to the one I saw; and all of which, to a greater or lesser extent, made him seem like a chattering, unmotivated fool. On what I know the film I saw to have been, I think that Robert Arden might have achieved a rather successful career as a leading man/tough guy in American movies of the late 1950's and 1960's. [Paola Mori was another matter. Her larking role as the daughter of a social climber led her, as the Countess Paola Di Gerfalco, out of a cloud of criticism about her Italian aristocratic fascist family, but into what was apparently a not terribly happy life as the third Mrs. Orson Welles in the deserts of the American Southwest. One hopes that she had lots of jigsaw puzzles.] As for Patricia Medina, through tireless hard work, she had a long career as star of some entertaining British films from 1937 on, married British film matinee idol Richard Greene for a decade, managed a Hollywood career as a voluptuous bombshell, took on quite a bit of stage work, some of it on Broadway, some of it with her second husband Joseph Cotten, with whom she seems to have had a devoted marriage and partnership. She, of course, loads of Television, for which she was well paid, and continued in demand as late as 1994, the year of Cotten's death. So far as I can tell, she is still alive and as reasonably well as can be expected, at age 88. She published her autobiography in 1998: Laid Back in Hollywood: Remembering. I don't know it, but I expect that we might gain some insights into the relationship between Cotten and Welles from reading it. In any case, most show biz figures we paw over her can only have dreamed of such a long work and love-filled career as she had, even if loss inevitably intruded, and even if living at 88 can't be too much fun. She and Norman Lloyd may be the last of Welles' film contemporaries still alive! [Of course, Lloyd is 94, and will soon appear in BROADWAY: BEYOND THE GOLDEN AGE.
Roger: Though, of course, I can't really convey that 1955 experience to anyone, keats is right, and possibly even if Stefan Droessler had found the sequence of Zouk's release from prison, there might have been no way of recapturing the magic of Welles' genius. I have no quarrel with the work on the Complete MR. ARKADIN of Stefan, whom I hope to meet again next week, except for the ending, which I've discussed with him. He has intimated me as being a small influence in starting MR. ARKADIN with the body of Mily lying on the beach (looking a bit like the body of Dimitrios in THE MASK OF DIMITRIOS . . . well, not exactly), but I am equally sure the film should end with the Marquis of Rutleigh driving Raina away in her little sports car, leaving Van Stratten behind to remain an embittered adventurer like Michael Ohara, or to become, perhaps, a miserable hustler, as Arkadin had been, at first. Having the film end with the plane crashing instead seems to me a shock effect which Welles would never have gone for. It's just not the way I remember it. All of Welles' films have a denouement that allows the viewer to ponder the meaning of what she/he has seen. The version I saw of MR. ARKADIN did, too, but that takes nothing away from the admiration I have for Stefan's accomplishment -- one that has led on to others equally distinguished.
And that admiration certainly extends to you, Roger, who have created valuable work, and have contributed truly brilliant insights, here and elsewhere, into the works of Orson Welles.
Glenn