Page 1 of 2
Posted: Tue Nov 05, 2002 9:42 am
by Le Chiffre
It's too bad Bogdanovich can't direct something like Welles' screenplay for "Operation Cinderella" which he said was the best comic script he ever wrote. With his penchant for comedy, Bogdanovich would probably be perfect for it. Of course I haven't read it yet so I wouldn't know. The Natelie Wood project sounds interesting, certainly more provocative.
I have THE LAST SAILORS on tape and I think it's well worth having. There's a good 14-minute segment on the Jangadieros of Brazil that Welles must have especially enjoyed doing the narration for. In a strange way, it was as if he finally got to bring some kind of closure to IT'S ALL TRUE's "Four Men on a Raft" episode.
Posted: Tue Nov 05, 2002 1:49 pm
by Fredric
It seems like Peter is establishing himself again, playing it safe for a little while, maybe two or three pictures. Then he's going to pull out a headscratcher, I just know it. We'll have to wait and see....
OW & Peter Bogdanovich
Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2004 8:26 am
by Sir Bygber Brown
I just saw What's up Doc and was immensely entertained by it. I thought it was a fantastic picture. This is the first Bogdanovich movie i've seen, and i noticed Welles' influence on the way Bogdanovich framed shots. Also when he chose to use a zoom seemed perfectly timed, like at the end of the under-the-table dinner party scene. And the sense of fun throughout seemed Wellesian. Considering the impact Orson clearly had on Bogdanovich in the 70's, perhaps its not surprising that Orson can be glimpsed in this delightful work of Bogdanovich.
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:40 pm
by tony
Here's the URL for a youtube video of Peter Bogdanovich speaking in a festival seminar: it seems when he's not smoking a cigar and speaking about Orson Welles, he's a really interesting and nice guy:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYG9BlFFfvo
Also, check out the Cavett box for the Bogdanovich appearance on the director show, with Mel Brooks, Robert Altman and Frank Capra, all on at the same time! Again, he's charming, unpretentious, candid, and interesting.
I also like him in the Sopranos. And I saw a clip from The Last Picture Show recently: what a gorgious film, with an incredible performance from Jeff Bridges. As Cavett says (in his intro to the show): "If Peter Bogdanovich had only directed "The Last Picture Show", he would still belong in the pantheon of great directors."
Just keep him away from the subject of Welles!
:;):
PS: check out "Targets", a very nice first directorial effort.
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 2:07 pm
by Glenn Anders
I've always found Bogdanovich an interesting, engaging personality. His has been a rocky career, with a couple of highs and a number of lows, at least one down right tragedy.
Perhaps, it is a reticence from those experiences which has put you off.
Glenn
Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2006 4:18 pm
by tony
In a recent interview Bogdanovich said that in 1973 he offered Welles the job directing Daisy Miller, the Henry James novel; This is an interesting piece of news in that it refutes the reports that Peter never tried to help Welles get a job. Perhaps the reports that Welles was angry at Peter for never helping him were also false.
The material would seem to have suited Welles to a T:
http://www.storybites.com/jamesdaisy.htm
http://www.pagebypagebooks.com/Henry_James/Daisy_Miller/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0071385/
The film was to star Bogdanovich and his then current flame, Cybill Sheppard, but after thinking about it, Welles declined, and Peter decided to direct it himself, but not star in it. Here are two interesting little pieces on the film written by the fellow who told me about this interview, though the pieces don't mention it:
http://canadianken.blogspot.com/2006....in.html
http://canadianken.blogspot.com/2006....in.html
If you're interested, check out the other pieces on this blog; I think the writing is of excellent quality.
:;):
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 10:10 am
by Le Chiffre
Good articles Tony, thanks. I think DAISY MILLER is an underrated movie, and I like the harmonica score by Lavagnino. I think the reason it got blasted by alot of critics was the perception at the time that Bogdanovich was getting too lofty and needed some comeuppance, especially for trying to turn his girlfriend into a star. Of course, the year after that, he pretty much destroyed himself with his own Cole Porter disaster, AT LONG LAST LOVE, perhaps even more destructive then Welles's Cole Porter disaster.
The DAISY MILLER DVD has a good commentary by PB.
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 9:12 pm
by tony
I didn't know Lavagnino did the score! Do you know if it's available?
Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 12:16 am
by Le Chiffre
Not that I know of. It should be. The film actually suffers from the fact that they couldn't get Timothy Bottoms to play opposite Cybill Shepard. They and Bogdanovich could have continued their chemistry from THE LAST PICTURE SHOW. Plus Bottoms had just had a triumph with THE PAPER CHASE, co-starring with John Houseman in his Oscar-winning role as Professor Kingsfield. But they may be why they couldn't get him.
Why the Welles/Bogdanovich relationship became 'poisonous'
Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 11:48 am
by Alan Brody
There’s a section of an interview with Peter Bogdanovich from Peter Tonguette’s Orson Welles Remembered, which gives a pretty good indication as to why the relationship between Welles and Bogdanovich had, by the early 80’s, become ‘poisonous’, as Joseph McBride puts it. As Bogdanovich relates it, Welles, who had had a hand in the screenplay for Bogdanovich’s 1975 film Nickelodeon, was offered an acting part in the film too, the part eventually played by Brian Kieth. But Welles wanted too much money, and even though Burt Reynolds and Ryan O’Neal both agreed to forego part of their own salaries in order to satisfy Welles’s demands, Welles refused to let them do it when he found out about it.
Jump ahead four years to the production of Saint Jack, which was to be directed by Welles, and produced by Bogdanovich, Cybill Shepard, and Hugh Hefner. Shepard had been given the film rights to the novel as part of an out-of-court settlement with Playboy over the unauthorized publication of nude photos of her. As Bogdanovich says, the only reason why Shepard agreed to the settlement was so she could get those film rights for Orson to direct another picture in Hollywood.
Orson wanted the lead role to be played by Jack Nicholson, so with great effort and difficulty, Bogdanovich and Hefner were able to persuade Nicholson to break his existing contractual obligations and play the part. But then, just as they were getting ready to finalize the contracts with Nicholson, Welles suddenly changed his mind and decided he wanted Dean Martin instead. A furious and humiliated Bogdanovich then had to go tell Nicholson that Welles no longer wanted him. At this point, Hefner began having second thoughts about Welles directing the picture. The film was eventually directed by Bogdanovich himself, which reportedly angered Welles very much. The title role was played by Ben Gazzarra. If this story is true - and I see no reason to doubt it - it is unfathomable why Welles would want Dean Martin over Jack Nicholson, and it also indicates a possible reason why Nicholson, a few years later, turned down Welles’s offer of the lead in The Big Brass Ring.
Re: Why the Welles/Bogdanovich relationship became 'poisonous'
Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 3:30 pm
by evenswr
Alan Brody wrote:If this story is true - and I see no reason to doubt it - it is unfathomable why Welles would want Dean Martin over Jack Nicholson, and it also indicates a possible reason why Nicholson, a few years later, turned down Welles’s offer of the lead in The Big Brass Ring.
Well, Orson and Dean did all of those roasts together, and anyway, Martin was stellar in Rio Bravo.
Re: Why the Welles/Bogdanovich relationship became 'poisonous'
Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:22 pm
by RayKelly
Pure speculation on my part but Dean Martin's close friend and producer, Greg Garrison, had a long standing relationship with Welles. Orson put him through college (according to Joe McBride's book) and he was the executor of Orson's will.
Garrison played a part in getting Orson work in Hollywood. Maybe, just maybe, Orson wanted to do something nice for Garrison's boss, Dean.
OR, maybe like evenswr, Orson thought Dean was superb in Rio Bravo. Great Western I never get tired of seeing.
Re: Why the Welles/Bogdanovich relationship became 'poisonous'
Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 10:39 pm
by jbrooks
I had thought Nicholson agreed to do "The Big Brass Ring," but he wanted his (then usual) $2 million fee for it.
As for Martin, I wonder if Welles' fondness for him was behind the strong dislike Welles expressed for Jerry Lewis in one of his Dick Cavett show appearances.
Re: Why the Welles/Bogdanovich relationship became 'poisonous'
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 9:06 am
by Alan Brody
That's an interesting irony isn't it: Welles demanding too much money to act in a Bogdanovich film, then Nicholson demanding too much money to act in a Welles film after being given the shaft on a Welles/Bogdanovich film. What goes around...
Re: Why the Welles/Bogdanovich relationship became 'poisonous'
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:38 pm
by Blake Nicholas
Welles/Bogdanovich:
In addition to Orson Welles, the papers of Peter Bogdanovich and John Ford are in the Lilly Library.
You can learn some interesting things about The Other Side of The Wind in the Bogdanovich Collection at the Lilly.
Think of the symmetry of Welles-Bogdanovich-Tarantino.
Welles plays Fallstaff to Bogdanovich's Hal and then Bogdanovich plays Fallstaff to Tarantino's Hal.
I've also always been struck by the symmetry in the careers as Public Intellectuals, of Peter Bogdanovich and Joe McBride.
Both wrote extensively on Welles, Ford and Hawks.
At his recent talk at the Hammer Museum at UCLA, Bogdanovich seemed to not want to say much of anything about The Other Side of The Wind.